The Christos Culture Podcast #2: Electric Boogaloo

“[7] The Lord is my helper: and I will look over my enemies. [8] It is good to confide in the Lord, rather than to have confidence in man. [9] It is good to trust in the Lord, rather than to trust in princes.” – [Psalms 117:7-9]

In this episode of our podcast, we discuss a wide variety of topics, including our rejection of IronMarch Fascism as a worldview in favor of traditionalist, sedevacantist Roman Catholicism, a discussion on the differences between religion, philosophy and ideology, the proper understanding of race and political activism per Catholic teaching, and a criticism of both Eastern Orthodoxy and Christian Identity. We will be putting out further content addressing Christian Identity and its errors in the future. This podcast is also in honor of our one year anniversary.

Hail Christ the King, and Hail Victory!

Author: Chilliers


49 thoughts on “The Christos Culture Podcast #2: Electric Boogaloo”

    1. Indeed. We plan on keeping the IM stuff under a specific fascist section in the future. We personally, completely disavow the position of IronMarch in favour of the superior worldview of Roman Catholicism and more specifically sedevacantism. We see fascism as purely utilitarian, it brings those who desire order to reject the ideas of modernism and accepting tradition. However, it’s lead astray many and can be harmful to those who do not wish to find the entire truth and are okay with man-made falsehoods. For example, AWD and the Base. These groups have a pure satanic hatred towards the system and wish to accelerate the system’s collapse for the sake of collapse and not the restoration of tradition.


  1. I have heard nothing of substance in this entire wasted hour+
    Thinking the soul is what makes someone smart? Monkeys have been smarter than blacks but you wouldn’t say they have souls. This is a non argument.

    CI follows the food laws so if anyone would think that blacks can be eaten now it would be you who wants to eat pig and other non foods.

    It is completely illogical to accept other races into the religion but not into your country, or to even be racist and be universalist.

    Yahweh disagrees with the idea that killing children is wrong. (Reference conquest of Canaan killing all the women children and men) or (Reference Christ on children of fornication in Revelation 2:20-23… 20 Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. 21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. 22 Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. 23 And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.)

    Very bad discussion on my comments. You just trolled.
    How is this Ethiopian going to Jerusalem for the feast days? Unless he was a Judean he would not be allowed in dumby
    You guys don’t know what you are talking about and are very bad at sounding intellectual or honest, you are “coom brain”

    (Isaiah 45:23-25) 23 I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear. 24 Surely, shall one say, in the Lord have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. 25 In the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.

    (Romans 11:29-32) 29 Indeed the favor and the calling of Yahweh are not to be repented of. 30 Even as you were at one time disobedient to Yahweh, but now are shown mercy due to their disobedience; 31 in that manner these also are now in opposition to your mercy, so that they may have mercy shown to them. 32 Therefore Yahweh has enclosed all in disobedience, that He may show mercy to all.
    All His people gain mercy

    (Matthew 12:41-42) 41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here. 42 The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.
    Adamic Non-Israelites are in the resurrection as well

    (1 Peter 3:18-20) 18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: 19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; 20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
    Even those of the flood were saved. Just as it says Christ died for the unjust which is all of Adamic kind. No man can justify himself and no man can save himself with his actions.

    (Romans 3:9-12) 9 What then, are we better? Not at all: for we previously accused both Judaeans and Greeks all with being at fault: 10 just as it is written, “that there is none righteous, not even one: 11 there is none understanding, there is not one seeking after Yahweh.” 12 “They have all turned away, together they have become unprofitable; there is none practicing kindness, there is not so much as one;
    Connected with…
    (1 John 1:7-10) 7 But if we would walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another and the blood of His Son Yahshua cleanses us from all guilt. 8 If we should say that we have no guilt, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we would admit our errors, He is trustworthy and just, that He would remit the errors for us and would cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we should say that we have not done wrong, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us.
    Connected with…
    (Romans 5:19-21) 19 Therefore even as through the disobedience of one man the many were set down as wrongdoers, in this manner then through the obedience of One the many will be established as righteous. 20 Moreover, law entered in addition, that the transgression would increase; but where guilt increased, favor exceeded beyond measure, 21 that just as guilt reigned in death, so then favor shall reign through justice for life eternal, through Yahshua Christ our Prince.
    Retold in…
    (1 Corinthians 15:22) Just as in Adam all die, then in that manner in Christ all shall be produced alive.

    (1 Timothy 5:24-25) 24 Some men’s sins are open beforehand, going before to judgment; and some men they follow after. 25 Likewise also the good works of some are manifest beforehand; and they that are otherwise cannot be hid.
    Some men repent in this life while others follow after. There will indeed be no sinners in heaven because they will all repent, just like there will be no race in heaven because they will all be white.

    (1 Peter 2:9-10) 9 But you are an elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people, so that you should proclaim the virtues for which from out of darkness you have been called into the wonder of His light, 10 who at one time were “not a people” but now are the people of Yahweh, those who “have not been shown mercy” but are now shown mercy.
    Referencing a ton of OT scripture points of the Israelites being an elect race and a holy nation. Followed by a referenced to Hosea 1:6-10 where Israel is divorced and told they would have no mercy and not be His people. But that “it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God.”

    (1 John 3:8-10) 8 He who is creating error is from of the False Accuser, since the False Accuser errs from the beginning. For this the Son of Yahweh has been made manifest, in order that He would do away with the works of the False accuser. 9 Each who has been born from of Yahweh does not create wrongdoing, because His seed abides in him, and he is not able to do wrong, because from of Yahweh he has been born. 10 By this are manifest the children of Yahweh and the children of the False Accuser. All who are not bringing about justice are not from of Yahweh, and he not loving his brother,
    As is shown throughout all the Bible, There are only two possibilities. Son or Bastard, Wheat or Tare, Good fish or Bad fish, Sheep or Goat, Good tree or Bad tree. If you are Born From Above then you will see the kingdom, but not if you are born from below.

    (Deuteronomy 23:2-3) 2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord. 3 An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the Lord for ever:
    NO MONGRELS, MAMZERS, or Incest babies. Christ said himself he would kill these children as I showed way above.

    You are making fun of someone for talking about Aristotle but that is who brought you to Catholicism lol
    This is very autistic and not at all “academic or intellectual”

    Oh and if you cannot privately interpret the Bible then just throw yours out. Just listen to your daddy god and the gods that came before him.


    1. Yeah, no one can privately interpret scriptures. I’m not going to go into your half baked retardation when you don’t even understand how a book in the bible is or isn’t canon. Why is Matthew in the biblical canon whereas the acts of paul and thecla arent in the biblical canon? Or why isn’t the shepherd of Hermas in the biblical canon? does the bible tell us the canon? Did the bible appear ex nihilo, like what the Muhammadans claim about the Qu’ran?

      So who canonized the bible? The Holy Catholic and apostolic church. The gates of hell will never prevail over the church and peter was the rock upon which the church was built. I couldn’t care less about what nonsense you spout, you do not have a visible point of unity, nor do I have any reason to believe in your interpretations of Holy Writ scripture over those of the Black Hebrew Israelites if anyone can interpret scripture. I read my bible in the light of the Church and the Church fathers, without them I’d be lost. And thats what the church is, the shepard of the flock. Thats who peter is. Now all I have to say to you is submit to Rome or be damned!

      Also if all whites will be saved then please do me a favour and leave because Huddy and I are whitoids and don’t need your autistic proselytism if we’re already saved because of our biological faculties. Hell why should i even care about what CI says if all whites are predestined for salvation? You sound like a retarded luther telling me to Sin Boldly because once saved always saved.


      1. You need to change your ways to get rewards in heaven buddy. Can you actually address anything or you just going to forfeit my points?
        Do you own a Bible? seems you believe you shouldn’t. If so why not throw it out?


      2. All knees will bow. You emphasized the fact that all whites will go to heaven. Also what is this, do CI believe that salvation is by works and faith? Sounds a little catholic there.

        Anyways you didnt address my fundamental argument as to how we can consider certain books canon in the bible. If we can understand the bibles canon then we can debate scripture and the meaning of it.


      3. Your argument on canon is neither here nor there. The main point of the Isaiah 45 post is “ALL THE SEED OF ISRAEL SHALL BE JUSTIFIED AND SHALL GLORY”

        Salvation is based on both the Promise to Abraham and the purpose of the creation of Adam.
        You can be saved in this world for following Yahweh, weather from destruction or just hard times.
        Eternal Salvation is a Racial phenomenon and He will not allow any of His children to be taken from His hand.


      4. >When you want to change the subject
        >Accuse the other person of moving the goal post
        >Look at my Wikipedia bro


      5. I wasn’t moving the goal post. I cannot debate scripture with ypu u less we know where it comes from. You’re presupposing that your biblical canon is holy writ and i am simy attacking your presupposition.

        How can we simply presuppose the bibles canonicity? We have different views on how scripture is interpreted, you are a mini pope electing yourself as the infallible interpreter and i look towards the church and the vicar of christ on earth.

        Now as i stated originally, how is there a biblical canon? Then we can interpret scripture. The bibles canon is the meat and potatoes of the argument at hand here


  2. The canon arose organically before any centralised authority established it by way of councils or anything of the source. Matthew can be determined to have been written in the first century, without any doubts.



    1. When did the Church decide the Canon?

      We know most of these fake gospels are fake before they appear centuries after they were purported to have been written. Usually from 3-5 manuscripts at best.


      1. Let alone your Church has interpreted less than 10 verses so I guess nobody can interpret the Bible if there is no private interpretation allowed


      2. The Gospel of Judas is a Gnostic gospel whose content consists of conversations between Jesus and Judas Iscariot. It is thought to have been composed in the second century by Gnostic Christians, not by Judas, since it contains late-2nd-century theology. The only copy of it known to exist is a Coptic language text that has been carbon dated to AD 280, plus or minus 60 years. It has been suggested that the text derives from an earlier Greek version. A translation of the text was first published in early 2006 by the National Geographic Society.
        More than 200 years after Judas.
        It’s gnostic in nature. Based on one manuscript.

        Acts of Paul was disregarded because of how feminist it is, contrary to Paul.


      3. Thats not really the point my guy. Im simply asking why that isnt in the canon and how these CI can know what books are and arent canon without the church.

        The acts of paul and thecla are encritite


      4. Just because it has 2 or 3 manuscripts doesnt mean its not holy writ. The church decided the canon very gradually. It was an organic process, however we dont believe in sola scriptura so that doesnt matter. There wasnt even a biblical canon until the 7th or 8th century. Stop moving the goal post and answer the question

        Now howd you get your biblical canon


    2. Blaspheming the church fathers is absolutely unacceptable. I agree the canon did arise organically? So how did we function with the scriptures and an official canon for 600+ years?


      1. Do you all look up to your father gods? very pagan and gay. People were reading the scripture long before 600 AD


      2. I never said there wasnt scripture before 600 AD. thats a straw man, i said there was no canon. The church fathers are mostly saints hence why i say to not blaspheme the saints


      3. I told you my position. We dont worship or adore saints. Nor did i say there was no scripture until 600 AD. I dont get what youre even discussing you just threw a strawman and an ad hominem at me lmao


      4. So, can we get back on track or you just going to keep this pointless discussion of Durr we compiled the Bible so only we can interpret it. It’s a non argument and very annoying. If it doesn’t contradict and we have good evidence of their validity then they are scripture end of story. If it is quoted by other scripture then it is scripture as well.

        So can you actually address anything I said or can you only obfuscate and troll?


      5. If the church canonized the bible then you admitnthe infallibility of the church. Thats the hole point of the argument. If the bible is infallible and the church compiled it and canonized it then the church is infallible and CANNOT err. It works like this, If B comes from A, and B is infallible then A is infallible. Its a logical proof. Now if we say the church can err then we admit fallibility of A, and since B comes from A and A is fallible it follows B is fallible. So if the church is fallible then so too is the bible.

        Which is blasphemy.


      6. I don’t agree they canonized it nor their power. The Word is the Word, just because some fags in dresses think they put it together and it is perfect how they did it means nothing.



      7. So did the bible appear ex nihilo?

        I agree that there was an organic process to the canon of scripture however on what authority do you have to claim that something is or isnt scripture.

        Also the first canon we have on scripture was at the council of Trent. This was the first canonization of scripture actually. So the church opperated 1500 years without an officially canon? But how does that work if we accept sola scriptura?

        So yeah the church did canonize it.


      8. This argument is worthless and meaningless…
        We can know them to be true scripture with study and discernment. We can know things like Matthew. Matthew can be determined to have been written in the first century, without any doubts. I don’t care about your opinion on these faggots in dresses and their authority. ADDRESS THE FUCKING POINTS MADE


      9. K, so you are incapable of anything except trolling and obfuscating… Good talk autistic cunt.
        Enjoy your shame and everlasting contempt.


        (Isaiah 45:23-25) 23 I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear. 24 Surely, shall one say, in the Lord have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. 25 In the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.



  3. When you cannot control yourself and have no ability to talk about the Word of God so must just troll until nobody wants to talk to you right?

    You people are so disingenuous you should be put in a cell and reeducated. Lemme know when your infallible faggots interpret more than 10 verses


      1. I never said you would be damned.
        I said you would live eternally in shame and contempt. You will be rewardless in the kingdom. You will be the least because you are so blind with your self righteousness that you believe yourself above other brethren and accept abominations into the fold.
        Learn the Word of God nigger, not the word of men.
        Your question has been answered and the point was just to obfuscate and ignore the fact that you are scripturally inept. As I said and you have not fought against, your “Church” has only interpreted 10 or less scriptures. So if there is no other who can show me what the Bible means then there is endless verses that can never be known the meaning of. Hence you have zero ability to actually debate the substance of my claims. You can just sit here and make fallacious arguments and obfuscate till the cows come home. You and your type of people are a disgrace to Yahweh and a hindrance to Christianity. You want to talk about logic and proving things but you cannot prove anything. You are no better than the atheist listening to lab coats


      2. How do you live in the Kingdom of God rewardless? Upon entering heaven you are sinless and witness the beatific vision…

        I know the word of God, you only know your race and put it above God.

        You have moved the goal post every time, i got to the heart of the matter and you refuse to answer me.

        I’m done with this boomer retardation. If you want a debate we’ll do it publically, hell we’ll even live stream it. Invite anyone, invite Finck. I don’t care. I’m done arguing this nonsense with you arrogant materialists. we gave you a chance last time, you denied it, you call us arrogant and without integrity but I offered for you to come on and debate us. But no you guys are pussies and lack any courage to come on. So if we will continue this we’ll debate this… im done approving you retarded protestant boomers


      3. We were challenging you to it a month ago and you just ignore us buddy. So calm down with your high and mightiness cunt. You don’t know shit about the scripture because you apparently cannot as again your Church has only interpreted less than 10 verses so unless you are making up your own personal interpretation you cannot know anything. The whole world will be the Kingdom of God, I don’t add to the Bible and say what it means to be rewardless in heaven, I just read it and see that those building up bad works will live but have no reward.

        I am not the one here who moves the goal post. You have completely obfuscated and ignored all of the points I made, I can only assume that means you concede on my points made. That is not the heart of the matter, the heart of the matter is the scripture and you inability to accept what the apostles say. Not some troll meme about who put certain books together.


      4. If you guys are willing to debate you can send a way to contact you, other than through here, via the contact page. This will be the last comment I approve of here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s