“Modern Man, instead of attempting to raise himself to truth, seeks to drag truth down to his level.” – Rene Guenon
The modern neo-Pagan Fascist has a reactionary attitude toward Christianity. It’s as if they go to a Protestant or Novus Ordo mass and think that represents true Christianity. They see “meekness” in the church and see people advocating for something that is inherently anti-Fascist, and most importantly, anti-Christian. They are repulsed by what they experience, unsurprisingly, and go read materialist authors such as Ben Klassen or the 1800s Elliot Rodgers, Friedrich Nietzsche. These authors place the Darwinian theory above everything else, which is a modernist and materialistic outlook. Going down the rabbit hole, these neo-Pagans read the Holy Bible without any knowledge of the Apostolic Tradition, or the Church in general, and interpret the Scripture by themselves and find some things they don’t like, then go off about how “Jewish” the Bible is. There’s a reason why before Martin Luther’s “reformation”, no one could get their hands on a Bible unless they were a priest, monk or some type of “holy person”.
One thing I find difficult to understand is how you, a person living in the Modern World, can tell me what this or that means in a complex Holy Book with over 30,000 verses. And while these neo-Pagans are telling me this through their 21st century reactionary mindset, they throw away 1,500 years of European thought, culture, and tradition. How our people would manage to be duped for 1,500 years, thrive off this “trick”, and still manage to live, and produce the majority of what the “European Identity” is, is quite the enigma. Either the anti-Christians think very lowly of our race, or they’ve been duped: by modern materialism, and see nothing admirable about our tradition and culture. Someone has to be wrong here, either the anti-Christian or 1,500 years of our Christian Europeans. Seems like the odds are against the anti-Christian neo-Pagan.
“It seems to me that nothing would be more foolish than to re-establish the worship of Wotan. Our old Mythology had ceased to be viable when Christianity implanted itself. Nothing dies unless it is moribund.” – Adolf Hitler
The whole “My Race is my Religion” bit is nothing but nonsense, and offers us nothing higher and isn’t based off any sort of truth or tradition. We also went over race in our other article “Racial Un-Reality”. This nonsense leads to racial materialism and kills off anything higher or metaphysical. To say there’s no definitive proof of God is a non sequitur and contradictory. The statement “there’s no blank” is what’s called a universal negative proposition. It’s negative because it says “no”, and it’s universal because it encompasses everything. Let’s, for the sake of example, say that I said, “There are no cats in Kentucky.” We can prove or disprove this proposition by fanning out and searching every nook and cranny of Kentucky to confirm there are no cats in that state. But notice when the Atheist says, “There’s no God,” he isn’t saying there’s no God in Kentucky, or there’s no God in the United States, or there’s no God on earth. He’s saying there’s no God wherever you may look, in the universe, in a void, everywhere and anywhere. What does this imply? It implies a Godly trait, omniscience.
“22 Although they claimed to be wise they became fools […] 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things rather than the Creator – Who is forever praised. Amen.” – Romans 1:22, 25
The New Testament
There are numerous verses/chapters in the New Testament that neo-Pagans and Atheists like to throw at Christians to “btfo” them in a debate or argument about religion. The following are:
Romans 13: They say this chapter is contradictory to the message and philosophy of SIEGE, but fail to read the chapter in congruence with the entire Bible, and like to pick and choose what they wish to read and what they wish to ignore. The very first verse says “Let every soul be subject unto higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that are ordained of God.”
The argument of it being anti-SIEGE falls apart in the very first verse. In any major European tradition, the rulers were seen as either gods themselves, or in Christian Europe, ordained by God Himself and the direct image of divinity. [Source]
“I am born in a rank which recognizes no superior but God. To whom alone I am responsible for my actions.” – Richard I of England
But if this still doesn’t convince you, may you open up your Bible and look at the notes at the bottom. The Orthodox Study Bible says (Roman Catholic Bibles will say similar things because this isn’t a theological particularity)
“13:1-3 To defy the civil Government is to defy God, for God works in and through the governing authorities. This principle holds true so long as the civil ordinance is NOT in opposition to God, but promotes good works. When civil authorities are in direct opposition to God, the believer MUST follow God. (see Acts 4:19; 5:29)” – Orthodox Study Bible, p. 1544
“But Peter and John Said to them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you more than to God, you Judge.” – Acts 4:19 (NKJV)
“But Peter and the other apostles answered and said “We ought to obey God rather than men…” – Acts 5:29 (NKJV)
Another Bible chapter that is brought up consistently, which has been went over by Florian Geyer and Sven Longshanks on Radio Aryan in four, 30 minute podcasts: Matthew Chapter 5 (Listen Here). We’ll just go over some basics here, such as the minor verses that are picked out and thrown around like some kind of ragdoll among anti-Christian neo-Pagans.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” – Matthew 5:3 (NKJV)
“5:3 Blessed in this context indicates Heavenly, spiritual exaltation rather than earthly happiness or prosperity. In Hebrew, “poor” means both (1) the materially poor and (2) the faithful among God’s people. The poor in spirit are those who have the heart of the poor, same attitude as the poor, and are totally dependant on God.” – Orthodox Study Bible, p. 1273
Those who would be “poor in spirit” are not literally those who have “bad spirit”, but those who are humble, have a humble attitude towards life, are in constant prayer and giving thanks to God.
“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth” – Matthew 5:5 (NKJV)
“5:5 Meekness is an attitude of being content with both honour and dishonour. It is an imitation of Christ, who said, “Learn from me for I am gentle [meek] and lowly in heart” (11:29). The meek are God controlled and have mastery over their passions, especially anger. Meekness is NOT passive weakness, but strength directed and under control. The earth that the meek will inherit is not power or possession in this world, but the new earth, which is everlasting (Rev 21:1).” Orthodox Study Bible, p. 1273
The OSB commentary above is very reminiscent of what George Lincoln Rockwell said:
“A firecracker has not the force of a rifle bullet because it explodes harmlessly in all directions. But the gas from a rifle bullet cannot escape, except by forcing the bullet out at terrific speed, because it is confined, directed into useful channels.” – White Power, Chapter XII “Fifty Years of Failure”
You can see Jesus’ meekness in the Gospel According to John, Chapter 2, where Jesus takes up some cords and whips the Jewish money lenders, merchants, and tax collectors, cleansing God’s temple. He goes on to prophicise the Temple being torn down and rebuilt in three days.
“You have heard it said ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. But I tell you to not resist an evil person, but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.” – Matthew 5:38-39 (NKJV)
During this time it was very common to initiate a duel by slapping someone on the cheek. If you decline the offer to duel this would wreck your social status within the community. Christ here is saying to “resist the evil person” and to not engage in evil practices because a vile person tempts you into doing it and it that it may “wreck your social status”. The whole point of turning the other cheek is to be patient and to show humility, as well, this cannot contradict Matthew 5:5. If Jesus is advocating for total passivism then this would contradict Matthew 5:5, Luke 22:36, and Genesis 9:6. Jesus affirmed us earlier in this chapter that he has not come to destroy the Law but to preserve it (Matthew 5:17-20).
“You have heard it said, ‘you shall love your neighbour and hate your enemy.’ but I say to you love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who persecute you.” Matthew 5:43-44 (NKJV)
“The lack of two words to distinguish public and private enemy also has contributed to confusion in the interpretation of the well-known Biblical passage (Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27) “Love your enemies.” The Greek and Latin versions use the words referring to a private enemy. And this is indeed to what the passage refers. It is obviously an adjuration to put aside hatred and malice, but there is no necessity whatever that one hate the public enemy. Hatred is not contained in political thinking. Any hatred worked up against the public enemy is non-political, and always shows some weakness in the internal political situation. This Biblical passage does not adjure one to love the public enemy, and during the wars against Saracen and Turk no Pope, saint, or philosopher so construed it. It certainly does not counsel treason out of love for the public enemy.” Francis Parker Yockey, Imperium, p. 130-131
“And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt” – Leviticus 19:33-34
The Hebrew word for stranger means sojourner. This has nothing to do with giving immigrants the right to stay and live within your nation. Also notice this has nothing to do with allowing racial aliens to procreate with your people or allowing this practice to go on. [Strongs 1616]
Racial aliens tend to be violent, so they aren’t sojourners but enemies of the race and state. On this basis alone it is not sinful to deny a negro the right into your country as a “sojourner”.
“Do not think that I have come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And ‘a man’s enemy will be those of his own household’.” – Matthew 10:34-36 (NKJV)
“Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you not at all, rather division. For from now on five in one house will be divided: three against two and two against three.” Luke 12:51-52 (NKJV)
“12:51 There are two kinds of peace. False peace, to which Christ refers here, is a shallow harmony that results in ignoring issues of Truth. Genuine peace is reconciliation to God through faith in Christ and surrender to Truth. Genuine peace has Division as a byproduct because not everyone wants Truth. In the fallen world, divisions are necessary for Truth to manifest (see 1Co 11:18-19)” Orthodox Study Bible, p. 1393
Christ was quite literally a revolutionary, predominantly in the spiritual sense, rather than the physical revolutionary or the “Hollywood guerilla”. Christ came to bring Truth, and in so bringing Truth he would not bring peace in a hippy sense, but in a salvific sense. Through this salvation/Truth can you acquire True Peace.
Some will bring up Peter cutting off the Roman guard’s ear and Christ rebuking him for doing this, and say this “proves” Christ advocated for pacifism. But the question they don’t ask is, “Why were Peter and the Apostles armed in the first place?”
“Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear.” John 18:10 (KJV)
Christ and his apostles would’ve been armed based off Christ’s command to sell your possessions to buy a sword (Luke 22:36). The concept of pacifism here is a stretch and doesn’t add up with other scripture. It contradicts it rather than supports it.
“There is neither Greek nor Jew, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Jesus Christ.” Galatians 3:28 (NKJV)
People tend to take this verse out of context, and isolate this verse and say “xd this is your face”. In reality, this is not an obstruction of the physical realities of race, sex, and subjective liberty, quite the contrary. In Jesus himself, we become one, a quality mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita:
“The yogi who knows that I and the Supersoul within all creatures are one worships Me and remains always in Me in all circumstances. He is a perfect yogi who, by comparison to his own self, sees the true equality of all beings, both in their happiness and distress, O Arjuna!” – Bg 6:31-32
It’d be foolish to say that this means literally all beings are equal, whatever shade, colour, sex, or status. If I did say that it’d be out of ignorance for what this passage actually entails. That reaching a higher state, these material things cease to hold you down. In transcendence race, sex, slave, or free cease to affect you spiritually. This isn’t to say they cease to exist materially.
Christ himself has no “prejudice” for who can be saved, whether inferior or superior. Material things do not hold you from salvation and spiritual liberation. The egalitarian argument is ruined later by Paul who says:
“And without all contradictions the less [inferior] is blessed of the better [superior]” – Hebrews 7:7 (KJV)
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.” – 1 Timothy 2:12 (KJV)
“Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as men pleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God…” – Colossians 3:22 (KJV)
As well as in the Gospel According to Luke, stating:
“And that servant, which knew his lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither according to his will shall be beaten with many stripes. But he that knew not, and did not commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.” Luke 12:47-48 (KJV)
Race being something material, dissipates when it comes to spiritual aspects. This is not to say race isn’t important. Race holds value, but not as much value when it comes to spiritual transcendence and spiritual salvation.
“Ye worship ye know not: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.” – John 4:22 (KJV)
Looking at the linguistic changes in the New Testament, we see an obvious shift in what “Jews” are. Jew ultimately means, when used in context of the OT and specifically in this verse, “from the tribe of Judah”. When used in the NT, most of the time it means to live in the region of Judea, but in this context it wouldn’t make much sense to say salvation is of the people residing in Judea, because geography changes and people who have resided their throughout the centuries have shifted so much. For example Paul called himself a Jew in the sense of his nationality (Phil. 3:5, Acts 21:39), such as how a Nord can call himself a Swede or a Dane; they’re ultimately of the same stock but different in nationality.
The shift of the meaning of Jew in the NT is quite dramatic, seeing as Christ goes on to call the “Jews” sons of the Devil and the synagogue of Satan (John 8:31-45, Rev 2:9, 3:9). Who would these Jews be? Well it’s most likely referring to the Ashkenazi Jews, the Jews of today. We can assume that based off what numerous Saints, Popes, Bishops, and theologians have said in the past centuries.
“Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed, Judas (Iscariot) is the image of the Jewish people: their understanding of Scripture is carnal; they bear the guilt for the death of the saviour, for through their fathers have killed Christ. The Jews held Him; the Jews insulted him; the Jews bound him; they crowned him with thorns; they scourged him; they hanged him upon a tree.” – St. Augustine of Hippo
“The Bible itself says that the Jews are an accursed people.” – Pope Clement VIII
“Do not add to your sins saying that the covenant is both theirs and ours. Yes, it is ours, but they (Jews) have lost it forever.” – St. Barnabas
In the latter quote, Barnabas says the covenant is “ours”, and not the Jews. This also adds to the switching of the meaning of “Jew”. In a sense it means that Christians have become the chosen people of God. And the Hebrews have thrown away their covenant with God. So they, in turn, became the synagogue of Satan.
Christ saying “Salvation is of the Jews” is also a confirmation of Biblical prophecy, ultimately the Christ coming from the tribe of Judah, this verse doesn’t mean to get on your knees and worship Jews because they can “save” you from hellfire. It is Christ alone who can save, the Son who sits at the right hand of the Father. Idolizing Jews is a disgrace to the Christian tradition and a grave heresy.
“But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” – Matthew 15:24 (KJV)
Christ here is fulfilling the prophecy of coming to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. If, let’s say, Christ manifested as a Roman and preached to the Romans in Latin, His message would be completely muddied by them not believing in the prophecy. It wouldn’t make sense for Christ to go to a people that never had God’s message, or if they did, lost it in the early stages of Roman history. Christ’s priorities were, Hebrews and then the Gentiles. Hebrews first, only because they’d perceive his message better. Later in this chapter Christ goes on to heal the woman, destroying of the whole myth he is “just for the Israelite’s”.
“To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.” – Romans 1:7 (KJV)
Origins of “Judeo-Christian” values
Friedrich Nietzsche started using this term to “discredit” Christian ethics by saying they’re “Jewish”; this, however, is false. The entirety of the Jewish race and how they act has nothing to do with the Old Testament (aka, the Torah), and has everything to do with the Talmud which in their religious life is more important than the Torah.
The Jewish religion has objectively shaped the Jewish spirit and made them as they are today. A cause and effect, the cause is the Talmud, them rejecting Christ and God numerous times, along with centuries of inbreeding/race-mixing with accursed peoples such as the Edomites. The effect is the Jewish race we have today, an extremely slimy, ugly, parasitic people, which have deemed themselves above God, and the gods of this world. This is not to say the problem isn’t racial, it’s both racial and spiritual, hence what I just said in the formerly. These things were all put into a pot, the heat turned up, stirred together, and cooked, until you got the Jew Stew.
The term “Judeo-Christian” was used by George Orwell and may be a reason why it became so popular. He also was a well known philo-Semite and Socialist who said:
“For quite six years the English admirers of Hitler contrived not to learn of the existence of Dachau and Buchenwald. […] Many English people have heard almost nothing about the extermination of German and Polish Jews during the present war. Their own anti-Semitism has caused this vast crime to bounce off their consciousness.” – George Orwell
This term was presumably made popular by anti-Nazi sentiment in America, which was predominantly White and Christian. So, it’d be advantages to group White Christians with the poor Jews to have those White Christians fight harder, because they think they’re spirituality is linked together, and that the Jews are the “chosen people”.
In the 40s, anti-Semitism was growing, to combat this (((they))) devised it’d be best for Jews and Christians to “unite”. This plan was devised to get rid of the Christian anti-Semitism and get rid of the whole “America’s a Christian Nation” idea. Although Jews had a general backlash to this, seeing how Christianity is a threat to their existence.
“Once one recognizes that Christianity has historically engendered anti-Semitism, then this so-called “tradition” appears as dangerous Christian dogma (at least from a Jewish perspective). For Christians, the concept of a Judeo-Christian tradition comfortably suggests that Judaism progresses into Christianity—that Judaism is somehow completed in Christianity. The concept of a Judeo-Christian tradition flows from the Christian theology of supersession, whereby the Christian covenant (or Testament) with God supersedes the Jewish one. Christianity, according to this belief, reforms and replaces Judaism. The belief therefore implies, first, that Judaism needs reformation and replacement, and second, that modern Judaism remains merely as a “relic”. Most importantly the belief of the Judeo-Christian tradition insidiously obscures the real and significant differences between Judaism and Christianity” – Stephen M. Feldman
But, the popularizing of “Judeo-Christian values” has helped lead us to what we have today, Christian Zionism. This heresy is even affecting major Roman-Catholic figures, such as Pope Pius XII saying we’re spiritually Semitic, which seen from above is contradictory what previous Christian figures have said.
Christianity, the biggest threat to the Kikes
“The New Testament writings, which rabbis considered more dangerous to the unity of Judaism than those of the Pagans…” – Jewish Encyclopedia. “Min”. page 595
Time and time again Christ and his followers are bashed in the Talmud, saying how they are the worst thing to Judaism, rather than our pagan ancestors. If the bigger threat was Paganism and not the “Judeo-Christian desert cult”, it logically would result in them making a point of doing that, rather than ripping at Christianity. Famous Jewish porn film maker Al Goldstein said that the only reason he made porn was to undermine America and their Christian values. Not paganism, paganism had became useless by the time Christianity was the victor in Europe.
Just looking at the laws of nature itself, nothing will die unless it is internally weak. The same thing applies to Christians as well, if Christianity died tomorrow it would cease to be internally united and strong. Anything that dies permanently ceases to hold any truth based off the laws of nature. Based off the superior conquering the inferior. This law applies to anything, even the White race itself.
This does not mean I’m saying Christianity is false or will die. But that if she did die, her prophecies would become meaningless because they’d be unable to be fulfilled. But, the devout knows God will not allow this to happen due to the basic fact the Jesus in his glory conquered Satan on the Cross. Jesus here passed the baton onto Europe, knowing He would reign king over the world through us and spread the message of salvation most effectively.
Hail Victory, and Hail Christ the King!